
تعداد نشریات | 43 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,685 |
تعداد مقالات | 13,838 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 32,717,154 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,928,673 |
DinI could be a suitable option in drug targeting strategies to reduce SOS mutagenesis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
زیست شناسی میکروبی | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 17 آذر 1403 اصل مقاله (482.05 K) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی- انگلیسی | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22108/bjm.2024.142477.1610 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نویسندگان | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Razieh Pourahmad Jaktaji* 1؛ Sare Mohammadi2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Department of Genetics, Faculty of Science, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2Department of Genetics, Faculty of Science, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
چکیده | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ciprofloxacin induces the SOS response. Induction of the SOS response confers resistance to ciprofloxacin through activation of DNA polymerase V. However, mutations in lexA, umuDC and especially recA prevent the evolution of resistance to ciprofloxacin. Alternatively, mutations in SOS proteins that regulate RecA activity, such as DinI, can reduce SOS mutagenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of DinI inactivation on the frequency of mutagenesis and expression of the umuD and rdgC genes after treatment with ciprofloxacin and to examine the promoter region and the 3′ end of the recA gene for possible changes in dinI (SM1 and SM2) mutants. Ciprofloxacin-resistant clones (SM1 and SM2) derived from the JW10481 (dinI- ) strain were used in this study. Mutagenesis analysis and real-time PCR were used to measure the frequency of mutant cells and the expression of umuD and rdgC genes in mutants, respectively. The promoter region and recA gene sequence were examined by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing in dinI- clones. SOS mutagenesis was significantly reduced (P<0.05) in SM1 and SM2 clones. These clones (dinI-) did not show overexpression of the umuD gene. rdgC gene was overexpressed in SM2, but not in the M2 mutant with intact dinI gene. Furthermore, DNA sequencing did not reveal any change in the recA gene sequence. The low frequency of mutagenesis and umuD expression in clones lacking DinI protein activity demonstrated the importance of this protein in SOS mutagenesis. In conclusion, DinI may be a suitable option in drug targeting strategies to enhance the efficacy of ciprofloxacin in combination therapy against a variety of infections caused by Escherichia coli and other Gram-negative bacteria with homologues of this protein. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
کلیدواژهها | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ciprofloxacin؛ DinI؛ Escherichia coli؛ Mutagenesis؛ SOS response | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
اصل مقاله | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction Ciprofloxacin (CIP) is a potent antibiotic that targets DNA gyrase in bacteria. However, resistance to CIP develops in Escherichia coli (E. coli) due to mutations in target genes, mainly gyrA, and overactivation of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump. The development of CIP resistance requires overactivation of the SOS response following exposure to CIP by interfering with gyrase activity and inhibiting replication fork progression. The stalled replication forks produce suitable substrates for RecA (1-3). Upon binding of RecA protein to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and formation of a cofilament, RecA either mediates strand exchange or promotes LexA autocleavage, leading to the production of many SOS proteins, including RecA and DinI (4). In addition to ssDNA and LexA, other proteins including DinI, UmuD and RecX bind to the helical groove of RecA filaments (5-6). DinI, RecX, RecFOR and RdgC have regulatory effects on RecA activity. RecX promotes filament disassembly, whereas DinI stabilizes RecA filaments after their formation (7-8). The RecFOR complex induces both association and dissociation of the RecA filament, and RdgC interferes with RecA activities (9). RdgC is an essential factor for growth in priA mutants as it counteracts RecFOR-mediated RecA loading on ssDNA (10). Given the importance of SOS induction in causing mutagenicity and antibiotic resistance, finding a target to reduce SOS induction would be very beneficial. Inactivation of the DinI regulatory protein would be one way to reduce RecA activity and SOS mutagenesis following CIP treatment. To date, many chemicals have been proposed to inhibit RecA and LexA activities in Escherichia coli (11-12), but the effect of DinI inactivation on reducing SOS mutagenesis has not been investigated. In the previous study, we generated CIP resistant clones (SM1 and SM2) from the strain JW10481 (dinI- ) strain and measured their resistance to CIP and the expression of the recA gene in them. The SM2 clone (dinI-) overexpressed recA, but 1.6 times less than the C17 mutant (dinI+) with the same level of resistance to CIP (13). In the present study, we measured the frequency of mutagenesis and the expression of umuD and rdgC genes in SM1 and SM2 clones and found that inactivation of DinI inhibits SOS mutagenesis. It has been proposed that the C-terminal part of RecA modulates RecA binding to different substrates, including ssDNA, LexA, DinI and UmuD. Therefore, the promoter region (containing the SOS box) and the 3′ end of the recA gene were examined for possible alterations in the above clones. It was found that the reduction in SOS mutagenesis was not related to the alteration of the recA SOS box or its 3ˈend sequence. These results suggest that one way to reduce SOS mutagenesis is to inactivate the DinI protein.
Materials and Methods Strains and mutants: CIP was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company. MG1655 wild type strain (carrying intact dinI gene, sensitive to CIP, 0.008 µg/ml), dinI- clones SM1 (sensitive to CIP, 0.3 µg/ml) and SM2 (moderate resistant to CIP, 1 µg/ml), both derived from JW10481 (BW25113 ΔdinI::Kanr, Keio collection) (13-14), W49 (gyrA mutant, sensitive to CIP, 0.6 µg/ml), C17 (moderate resistant to CIP, 1 µg/ml) and M3 (highly resistant to CIP, 40 µg/ml) mutants, both carrying the gyrA marOR double mutation (15), were used in this study. CIP-induced mutagenesis: CIP-induced rifampin resistance testing was performed according to a previous study (16). Fresh cultures of MG1655, two dinI- clones and M3 in LB without and with CIP (0.1 ˣ MIC of each strain) were placed in a shaking incubator at 37 °C for 4 h, then transferred to fresh LB broth and incubated overnight under the above conditions. Total cells were counted on LB agar with and without rifampin )20 µg/ml) to calculate the frequency of rifampin resistant mutants. The experiment was performed three times. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR): The qRT-PCR assay has been described previously (15). Fresh cultures of six strains and mutants were used to inoculate LB broth containing CIP (0.1 MIC of each strain). The cultures were incubated at 37 °C to reach an OD value of 0.4. The cultures were then used to extract total RNA using an RNA extraction kit (Qiagen, USA). Total RNA was used to synthesize cDNA (Reverse Transcriptase kit, Fermentas) for qRT-PCR using a SYBR Green kit (Yektatajhiz, Iran) and the micPCR machine (Biomolecular System, Australia). The primers are listed in Table 1. The thermal cycling condition was 95 °C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (95 °C, 10 s), annealing (50 °C–55 °C for 15 s, depending on the primer pairs used) and extension (72 °C for 20 s). Expression data are the mean of two assays. Statistical analysis: SPSS version 16 software student’s t-test was used to calculate significant differences between expression data. Amplification and sequencing of the recA gene: A single colony of each clone (SM1 and SM2) on LB agar containing CIP (0.1 MIC of each mutant) was used as a source of DNA template. Two pairs of primers were used to amplify the recA gene (Table 1) as previously described (15). The thermal cycling condition was 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (95 °C for 45 s), annealing (52 °C for 30 s) and extention (72 °C for 1 min). Final extention for 4 min. The sequence of the amplified products was determined using both primers. The nucleotide sequences were compared with that of strain MG1655 (ID: 947170) using the multiple alignment tool (Clustal W). The sequence of the SOS box upstream of the recA gene was obtained from previous work (17).
Table 1. Primers used for real-time PCR and colony PCR
a&b primers for amplification of the SOS box and 3ˈend of recA gene, respectively.
Results The amount of mutagenesis was significantly decreased in SM1 )0.6 ratio RifR/total cell) and SM2 )0.5 ratio RifR/total cell) compared to the wild type strain (6 ratio RifR/total cell, P<0.05) in the presence of CIP (Fig. 1). The same results were obtained in the absence of CIP. The mutagenesis value for SM1 and SM2 with different levels of resistance to CIP were not significantly different (P<0.05), but were significantly lower than the mutagenesis value for M3 (70 ratio RifR/total cell) with high levels of resistance to CIP in the presence of CIP (Fig. 1). Similar results were observed in the absence of antibiotic. Moreover, the levels of mutagenesis in MG1655 and M3 were significantly higher in the presence of antibiotic than in the absence of CIP (Fig. 1). The quantity and quality of the RNA samples were measured by spectrophotometry. After checking that the RNA samples were not contaminated with DNA, they were used to synthesize cDNAs. cDNAs used to measure gene expression. None of the dinI- mutants (SM1 and SM2) showed overexpression of the umuD gene (Table 2). These results are in agreement with the mutagenesis results. Our results showed that the dinI+ mutants (C17 and M3) were able to overexpress dinI gene (Table 2). rdgC gene overexpressed in the SM2 mutant but not in SM1 (dinI- mutant) and C17 and M3 (dinI+ mutants) (Table 2). After evaluating the quality of the RecA PCR products by gel electrophoresis, their sequences were determined by DNA sequencing. The sequences were visualised using Chromas version 2.6.6 (Fig. 2). Comparison of the FASTA format of the sequences with that of MG1655 using Clustal W showed no change in the sequence of the recA gene and its upstream region in SM1 and SM2.
Fig. 1. Frequency of rifampin resistant (RifR) mutants. The proportion of RifR cells were either untreated (black bar) or treated with CIP (grey bar). Lanes 1, 2, 3 and 4 are wild type, SM1, SM2 and M3. Values are means of three independent experiments ±SD.
Table 2. Relative expression of genes.
In all cases, the standard deviation was less than 10% of the mean.
T A C T G T A T GA G C A T A C A G TA T
GTA CGT GAG TTG CTG CTG AGC AAC CCG AAC TCA ACG CCG GAT TTC TCT GTA GAT GAT AGC GAA GGC GTA GCA GAA ACT AAC GAA GAT TTT TAA Val Arg Glu Leu Leu Leu Ser Asn Pro Asn Ser Thr Pro Asp Phe Ser Val Asp Asp Ser Glu Gly Val Ala Glu Thr Asn Glu Asp Phe * Fig. 2. Partial upstream (A) and downstream (B) DNA sequence of the recA gene. A. The sequence of the SOS box is underlined and bolded. B. The end of recA gene and its deduced amino acid sequence are shown.
Discussion and Conclusion The effect of DinI inactivation on the expression of umuD and rdgC genes in dinI- clones SM1 and SM2 was investigated. Our results showed that rdgC was overexpressed but umuD was not in these clones. In a previous study, recA was found to be overexpressed in mutants (with intact dinI gene and moderate resistance to CIP) (15). It was also found that the recA gene was overexpressed in the SM2 mutant (without intact dinI gene and intermediate level of resistance to CIP; however, the overexpression was less significant than that seen in the mutant with active dinI gene (P<0.05) (13). DNA sequencing results showed that this decrease in recA expression was not associated with changes in the upstream region of the recA gene containing the SOS box. The acquisition of high levels of resistance requires more SOS signals through efficient cleavage of LexA and UmuD. Our finding that umuD was not overexpressed in dinI mutants indirectly implies that the mutation frequency in dinI mutants is low. This is also confirmed by our finding that the mutation frequency in SM1 and SM2 was low in the presence and absence of CIP. This finding also showed that CIP can enhance SOS mutagenesis in the presence of intact DinI protein. On the other hand, the RdgC protein inhibits recombination and SOS induction (18-19). RdgC competes with RecA for binding to duplex DNA. DinI enhances the ability of RecA to compete with RdgC (19). Therefore, it was possible that in CIP treated cells lacking DinI, RecA cannot properly compete with RdgC for binding to duplex DNA and therefore cannot generate sufficient SOS signals. This possibility was indirectly revealed by the finding that the rdgC gene was over-activated in the dinI- mutant (SM2), but not in the dinI+ mutant (M3). In addition, the lower expression of recA and umuD suggests that the RecA loading activity of RecF may be reduced in the dinI mutant following rdgC overexpression. This possibility is consistent with previous finding that showed RdgC interferes with loading of RecA via RecFOR on ssDNA (10). Moreover, our previous finding showed overexpression of recF in SM1 (20) and dinI+ mutants following exposure to CIP (unpublished data). Again, this finding suggests that a factor may prevent RecF activity. The effect of RdgC protein on RecF in the absence of DinI requires further investigation. Moreover, the dinI gene was overexpressed in dinI+ mutants (C17 and M3). Therefore, it was expected that in the presence of DinI, RecA could adequately compete with RdgC for binding and forming stabilized filament on DNA. Taken together, there might be an inverse relationship between the expression and activity of RdgC and DinI. Additionally, our results indicated that the 3′ end of RecA remained unchanged in SM1 and SM2 clones. Therefore, we did not expect any change in the binding affinity of RecA to ssDNA, LexA, DinI and UmuD. Furthermore, the upstream sequence of the recA gene is intact in SM1 and SM2. Thus, the lower expression of recA in SM1 and SM2 is not related to an alteration in the SOS box. In this study, the dinI mutants SM1 and SM2 were used to evaluate the importance of the DinI protein in SOS mutagenesis. These mutants had a low frequency of mutagenesis and umuD expression. Therefore, it is concluded that in addition to RecA and LexA, DinI may be a suitable target for the design of an adjuvant to enhance the efficacy of CIP against E. coli and other Gram-negative genera harboring DinI homologues. Acknowledgments We acknowledge Shahrekord University for financial support and Biotechnology Center at Shahrekord University to provide real-time PCR machine. Declaration of interest statement The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Data availability statement All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
مراجع | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Revitt-Mills SA., Wright EK., Vereker M., O’Flaherty C., McPherson F., Dawson C., et al. Defects in DNA double-strand break repair re-sensitise antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli to multiple bactericidal antibiotics. Microbiology Open 2022; 11(5): e1316. https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fmbo3.1316 (2) Amarh V., Arthur PK. DNA double strand break formation and repair as targets for novel antibiotic combination chemotherapy. Future Science 2019; 5(8): FSO411. https://doi.org/10.2144%2Ffsoa-2019-0034 (3) Baharoglu, Z., Mazel, D. SOS, the formidable strategy of bacteria against aggressions. FEMS Microbiology Review 2014; 38: 1126-1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12077 (4) Maslowska KH., Makiela-Dzbenska K., Fijalkowska IJ. The SOS system: A complex and tightly regulated response to DNA damage. Environ Mol Mutagen 2019; 60(4): 368-384. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22267 (5) Alekseev A., Pobegalov G., Morozova N., Vedyaykin A., Cherevatenko G., Yakimov A., et al. A new insight into RecA filament regulation by RecX from the analysis of conformation-specific interactions. ELife 2022; 11: e78409. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78409 (6) Gao B., Su L., Won A., Zhou C., Feng Y. Structural basis for regulation of SOS response in bacteria. PNAS 2023; 120(2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2217493120 (7) Lusetti SL., Voloshin ON., Inman RB. The DinI protein stabilizes RecA protein filaments. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2004; 279(29): 30037-30046. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M403064200 (8) Ragone S., Maman J.D., Furnham N., Pellegrini L. Structural basis for inhibition of homologous recombination by the RecX protein. EMBO Journal 2008; 27(16): 2259-2269. https://doi.org/10.1038%2Femboj.2008.145 (9) Briggs GS., Yu J., Mahdi AA., Lloyd RG. The RdgC protein employs a novel mechanism involving a finger domain to bind to circular DNA. Nucleic Acid Research 2010; 38(19): 6433-6446. https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fnar%2Fgkq509 (10) Moore T., McGlynn P., Ngo HP., Sharples GJ., Lloyd RG. The RdgC protein of Escherichia coli binds DNA and counters a toxic effect of RecFOR in strains lacking the replication restart protein PriA. EMBO Journal 2003; 22(3): 735-745. https://doi.org/10.1093%2Femboj%2Fcdg048 (11) Mo CY., Culyba MJ., Selwood T., Kubiak JM., Hostetler ZM., Jurewicz AJ, et al. Inhibitors of LexA autoproteolysis and the bacterial SOS response discovered by an academic-industry partnership. ACS Infection Disease 2018; 4(3): 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00122 (12) Alam Md K., Alhamzi A., DeCoteau JF., Luo Y., Geyer C. R. RecA inhibitors potentiate antibiotic activity and block evolution of antibiotic resistance. Cell Chemical Biology 2016; 23(3): 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.02.010 (13) Mohammadi S., Pourahmad R., Mahzonieh M. R. recA gene expression in ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli dinI mutant. Journal of Microbial Biology 2018; 7(26): 65-72. https://doi.org/10.22108/bjm.2017.102689.1034 [In Persian]. (14) Baba T., Ara T., Hasegawa M., Takai Y., Okumura Y., Baba M., et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Molecular System Biology 2006; 2, 2006-2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100050 (15) Pourahmad Jaktaji R., Pasand S. Overexpression of SOS genes in ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli mutants. Gene 2016; 576(1): 115-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2015.09.069 (16) Pourahmad Jaktaji R., Nourbakhsh Rezaei SM. Inactivation of UmuC protein significantly reduces resistance to ciprofloxacin and SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli mutants harboring intact umuD gene. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology 2020; 13(12): e111828. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.111828 (17) Galkin VE., Britt RL., Bane LB., Yu X., Cox MM., Egelman EH. Two modes of binding of DinI to RecA filament provide a new insight into regulation of SOS response by DinI protein. Journal of Molecular Biology 2011; 408(5): 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2011.03.046 (18) Tessmer I., Moore T., Lloyd RG., Wilson A., Erie DA., Allen S., et al. AFM studies on the role of the protein RdgC in bacterial DNA recombination. Journal of Molecular Biology 2005; 350(2): 254-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.04.043 (19) Drees JC., Chitteni-Pattu S., McCaslin DR., Inman RB., Cox MM. Inhibition of RecA protein function by the RdgC protein from Escherichia coli. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2006; 281(8): 4708-4717. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M513592200 (20) Moosavi MS., Pourahmad R., Mahzoonieh MR. Expression of RecF and GyrB genes in a low ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli mutant. Journal of Microbial Biology 2018; 7(27): 53-60. https://doi.org/10.22108/bjm.2018.109936.1115 [In Persian]. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 54 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 40 |