[1] S. M. Adeniji, P. Baker and M. Schmude, Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) model: A mixed-method systematic review of research in mathematics education, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18 (2022).
[2] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Allyn and Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group), 2001.
[3] D. Baidoo-Anu and L. O. Ansah, Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning, Journal of AI, 7 (2023) 52–62.
[4] M. T. Chandio, N. Zafar and G. M. Solangi, Bloom’s taxonomy: reforming pedagogy through assessment, Journal of Education and Educational Development, 8 (2021) 109–140.
[5] A. H. Chillon, J. G. Molina, J. R. Hoyos and M. J. Ortín, Propagating Schema Changes to Code: An Approach Based on a Unified Data Model, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2023 pp. 10.
[6] J. W. Creswell, Mapping the field of mixed methods research, Journal of mixed methods research, 3 (2009) 95–108.
[7] E. Dubinsky, Using a theory of learning in college mathematics courses, MSOR Connections, 1 (2013) 10–15. https://doi.org/10.11120/msor.2001.01020010
[8] X. Q. Dao and N. B. Le, Investigating the effectiveness of ChatGPT in mathematical reasoning and problem solving: evidence from the vietnamese national high school graduation examination, arXivpreprint arXiv:2306.06331, 2023.
[9] R. Ely and S. R. Jones, The teaching and learning of definite integrals: a special issue guest editorial, Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Ed., 9 (2023) 1–7.
[10] M. Forehand, Bloom’s taxonomy, Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 41 (2010) 47–56.
[11] S. Fowler, C. Cutting, S. H. Fiedler and S. N. Leonard, Design-based research in mathematics education: trends, challenges and potential, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35 (2023) 635–658.
[12] S. Frieder, L. Pinchetti, R. R. Griffiths, T. Salvatori, T. Lukasiewicz, P. C. Petersen and J. Berner, Mathematical capabilities of chatgpt, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13867, 2023.
[13] A. S. González-Martín, The use of integrals in engineering programmes: A praxeological analysis of textbooks and teaching practices in strength of materials and electricity and magnetism courses, Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Ed., 7 (2021) 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00135-y.
[14] S. Grassini, Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings, Educ. Sci., 13 no. 7 (2023) 692.
[15] N. Hashemi, H. Kashefi and M. S. Abu, The emphasis on generalization strategies in teaching integral: calculus lesson plans, Sains Humanika, 12 (2020) 35–43.
[16] D. Horiuchi, H. Tatekawa, T. Oura, T. Shimono, S. L. Walston, H. Takita etal, Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy among GPT-4 based ChatGPT, GPT-4V based ChatGPT, and radiologists in musculoskeletal radiology, medRxiv, 12 (2023) 26 pp.
[17] C. H. Huang, Engineering students’ visual thinking of the concept of definite integral, Global Journal of Engineering Education, 15 (2013) 111–117.
[18] N. Hrebin, S. Grabovska, R. Karkovska and A. Vovk, Applying benjamin Bloom’s Taxonomy ideas in adult learning, Journal of Education Culture and Society, 11 (2020) 61–72.
[19] N. Karjanto, Mathematical modeling for sustainability: How can it promote sustainable learning in mathematics education?, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13663, 2023.
[20] C. K. Lo, What is the impact of chatgpt on education? a rapid review of the literature. Educ. Sci., 13 no. 4 (2023) 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
[21] N. Mahir, Conceptual and procedural performance of undergraduate students in integration, Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., 40 (2009) 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802213591.
[22] M. Mason, The van Hiele levels of geometric understanding, Colección Digital Eudoxus, 1 (2009).
[23] J. Mason, L. Burton and K. Stacey, Thinking Mathematically, (2th edition), Edinburgh: Pearson, 2010.
[24] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative data analysis: a method sourcebook, (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc, 2019.
[25] F. Nursyahidah and I. Albab, Investigating student difficulties on integral calculus based on critical thinking aspects, Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4 (2017) 211–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.15507.
[26] T. Pelton and L. F. Pelton, Adapting ChatGPT to Support Teacher Education in Mathematics, In Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), (2023) 1662–1670.
[27] N. Pinede, Thematic Analysis of Hyperlinks: A Taxonomic Approach, Analyzing Websites, (2023) 191–229.
[28] D. Serhan, Students’ Understanding of the Definite Integral Concept, International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1 (2016) 84–88. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105099.pdf
[29] A. Shoufan, Exploring students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: thematic analysis and follow-up survey, IEEE Access, 11 (2023) 38805–38818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268224.
[30] U. Sholihah and M. Maryono, Students’ visual thinking ability in solving the integral problem, JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5 (2020) 175–186. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.10286.
[31] R. Sternberg, Applying psychological theories to educational practice, American Educational Research Journal, 45 (2008) 150–165.
[32] O. Stumke, Information communication technology integration via Bloom’s taxonomy in accountancy curriculum, Transformation in Higher Education, 8 (2023) 11 pp.
[33] A. D. Sulistyaningtyas and R. R. Wantika, Analysis of student learning difficulties in solving calculus II course case studies, Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR), 4 (2023) 171–178.
[34] J. P. Remoto, ChatGPT and other AIs: Personal relief and limitations among mathematics-oriented learners, Environment and Social Psychology, 9 (2024) 13 pp. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1911
[35] D. Tall, Students’ difficulties in calculus, In Proceedings of Working Group, 3 (1993) 13–28.
[36] D. Tall, Making sense of mathematical thinking over the long term: the framework of three worlds of mathematics and new developments, Draft. To appear in D. Tall, and I. Witzke (Eds.): MINTUS: Beiträge zur mathematischen, naturwissenschaftlichen und technischen Bildung. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2019.
[37] R. D. Thomas, James Hutton’s concept of time: that of Leibniz, not Newton, Geology Today, 38 (2022) 108–111.
[38] H. H. Thorp, ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379 (2023) 313–313.
[39] I. Umami, Moderating influence of curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment practices on learning outcomes in indonesian secondary education, Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9 (2018) 60–75. https: //jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/243.
[40] K. V. Vlasenko, I. V. Lovianova, O. O. Chumak, I. V. Sitak and D. A. Kovalenko, The wheel of mathematics learning methods, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2611 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2611/1/012001
[41] Y. Wardat, M. A. Tashtoush, R. AlAli and A. M. Jarrah, ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
[42] R. P. Yudha, Higher order thinking skills (HOTS) test instrument: Validity and reliability analysis with the rasch model. EduMa: Mathematics education learning and teaching, 12 (2023) 21–38.
[43] Z. Zafrullah, M. L. Hakim and M. Angga, ChatGPT open AI: Analysis of mathematics education students learning interest. Journal of Technology Global, 1 (2023) 1–10.
[44] Z. Zetriuslita, R. Ariawan and H. Nufus, Students’ critical thinking ability: Description based on academic level and gender. Journal of Education and Practice, 7 (2016) 154–164.
[45] روح الله جهانی پور و سعید مقصودی, تاریخچهی بینهایت کوچکها و بینهایت بزرگها در حساب دیفرانسیل و انتگرال، فرهنگ و اندیشه ریاضی، 38 (1398) 77--121.
