بررسی مفهوم ذهنیت در افعال وجهی در زبان فارسی

رحیمیان، جلال. (1378). وجه فعل در فارسی امروز، مجله علوم اجتماعی و انسانی دانشگاه شیراز، دوره چهاردهم، شماره 2، صص 52-41

رضایی، حدائق. ( 1388). وجهیت و زمان دستوری در زبان فارسی با تأکید بر فیلمنامه‌های فارسی. پایان نامه دکتری، دانشگاه اصفهان

عموزاده، محمد و حدائق رضایی. (1389). ابعاد معناشناختی باید در زبان فارسی.مجله پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناسی، دوره اول، شماره 1، صص78-57

Austin, J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon

Butler, J. (2003). A Minimalist Treatment of Modality. Lingua 113, 967–996.

Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: a Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bybee, J. L. and Pagliuca, W. (1985). Cross-linguistic comparison and the develoment of grammatical meaning. In Fisiak, J. (ed.), Historical Semantics and Historical Word Formation, pp. 60–3. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Bybee, J. L. (1998). Irrealis as a Grammatical Category. Anthropological Linguistics 40, 257–271.

Chung, S. and Alan T, (1985). Tense, Aspect and Mood. Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Grammatical categories and the Lexicon, ed. By T. Shopen, 202-58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

De Haan, Ferdinand, (2000). The Relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische berichte. Hamburg, Helmut Buske Verlag.

Ehrman, M. (1966). The Meanings of the Modals in Present-day American English. The Hague: Mouton.

Evans, V. (2000). The structure of time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In: Bach, E., Harms, R.T. (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York, Holt Rinehart and Winston Inc, 1–88.

Foley, W., and R. Van Valin, (1984). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Givon, T. (1995). Functionalism and Grammar.  Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Givon, T. (1982). Evidentiality and epistemic space.Studies in Language. 6, 23-49

Groefsema, M. (1995). Can, may, must and should. Relevance theretic account. Journal of Linguistics, 31, 53-79.

Haegeman, L. (1983). The Semantics of “Will” in Present-day British English: a Unified Acccount. Brussels:Paleis der Academien.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1970). Functional diversity in language, as seen from a
consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6.3.
322-361.

Halliday, M.A.K., (1994) (2nd ed). An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K., (2002). On grammar. In: Webster, J. (Ed.). In: Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, vol. I. London and New York: Continuum.

Hare, R. (1970). Meaning and speech acts. Philosophical Review 79, 3–24.

Hengeveld, K. (1988). Illocution, mood and modality in a Functional Grammar of Spanish. Journal of Semantics 6: 227-269.

Hopper, P, and E. Closs Traugott. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lyons, J. (1997). Semantics, Vol 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Narrog, H. (2005). On Defining Modality Again. Language Sciences 27, 165–192.

Nuyts, J. (2000). Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

Nuyts, J. (2001). Subjectivity as an Evidential Dimension in Epistemic Modal Expressions. Journal of Pragmatics. 33, 383-400.

Palmer, F. R. (1990). Modality and the English Modals. London, Longman.

Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, F. R. (1998). Mood and Modality: basic principles. In: Brown, K., Miller, J. (Eds.). Oxford: Elsevier, 229–235. Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories

Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality, second ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Papafragou, A. (2000). Modality: Issues in the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam, Elsevier.

Perkins, Michael R. (1983). Modal Expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter

Sanders, J. and W. Spooren. (1997). Perspective, Subjectivity and Modality from a Cognitive Linguistic Point of View. In Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics. W. A. Limbert, G. Redecker, and L. Waugh (eds.), 88-112. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Searle, J. (1967). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sweetser, E. (1982). Root and epistemic modals: casuality in two worlds. Berleley Linguistics Society 8. 484-507

Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taleghani, H. A. (2008). Modality, Aspect and Negation in Persian. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12:49–100.

Tavangar, M. and M. Amouzadeh. (2009). Subjective modality and tense in Persian. Language Sciences 31, 853-873.

Traugott, E.C. (2003). Approaching modality from the perspective of Relevance Theory. Language Sciences 25, 657–669.

Traugott, E. C. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65, 31-55.

Von Wright, George H. (1952). An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam, North Holland.

Willet. T. L. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language. 12, 51-97.